techslo RSS Feed

Louis Forino von Thyssen Of MCC Oil Gas: Allegation Of Sexual Offence

techslo — Thu, 19 Sep 2024 04:52:44 -07:00

Louis Forino von Thyssen president of MCC Oil Gas case remains an ongoing saga, one in which wealth and power have so far provided an escape from justice. A convicted rapist who flaunts his ties to the energy sector while avoiding a prison sentence in France, Forino's story is a stark reminder of the legal and ethical challenges in apprehending financially powerful fugitives. Luigi Forino made his fortune in the oil and gas industry, where he is associated with companies like MCC Petroli, based in Geneva, and maintains a vast network of business ventures in both Italy and the UK. Forino, who has used the alias "Dr Louis Forino Von Thyssen," often presents himself as a well-connected businessman, linking his name to major players in the energy sector. According to trade articles and posts on LinkedIn, Forino has remained active, even boasting of new ventures and industry developments—actions that seem bizarrely confident for a man evading capture. Forino’s wealth has afforded him a lifestyle of luxury, residing in a £22 million Mayfair apartment in central London. His business and personal ties in the UK appear to have played a role in his ability to stay within the country, complicating efforts to bring him to justice. The story of Luigi Forino’s legal troubles began when he was arrested in Westminster in March 2023 by the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) on a European Arrest Warrant issued by France. French authorities had convicted Forino of rape in 2017, a charge for which he was sentenced to four years and six months in prison. It remains unclear whether Forino had been present at the trial or if he fled France before being sentenced. However, what is clear is that despite his conviction, Forino managed to evade imprisonment, eventually making his way to the UK. Initially, Forino’s extradition appeared to be proceeding as planned. He was conditionally bailed after a £20,000 surety was posted, with several restrictions placed on his movements. His passport was confiscated, and he was required to report to police weekly, while an electronic monitoring system enforced a nightly curfew from 11 PM to 5 AM at his opulent London residence. But Forino’s wealth and resources gave him the means to slip through the cracks of the British legal system. On December 8, 2023, he failed to show up for his extradition hearing, vanishing from the court’s radar entirely. Despite an active search by the NCA, he remains at large as of early 2024. On January 29, the £20,000 bail surety was forfeited, but that sum likely means little to a man of Forino’s financial standing. What makes this case particularly striking is Forino’s apparent defiance of his legal status. Despite being wanted in France and now a fugitive in Britain, he has continued to maintain an online presence, particularly in the energy sector. Using the alias "Dr Louis Forino Von Thyssen," he has been active on LinkedIn, promoting his involvement in oil and gas companies, and even setting up new UK-based firms. His ability to maintain such a public profile raises serious questions about the effectiveness of the efforts to track him down. In a broader sense, Forino’s case highlights the complexities of international law enforcement, especially when wealthy individuals use their resources and influence to evade justice. The fact that he has been able to remain active in business, while evading a prison sentence for such a serious crime, is deeply concerning for both the authorities and those advocating for justice for his victims. As of now, Forino is still being pursued by the NCA, but tracking down a man with Forino's financial and logistical resources is no simple task. His apparent disregard for the bail conditions, and his ongoing involvement in the business world, indicates a deep confidence in his ability to avoid capture.
Learn more: Louis Forino von Thyssen Of MCC Oil Gas: Allegation Of Sexual Offence

Inside the Dark World of Trucking Manipulation: Triton Logistics Inc

techslo — Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:52:19 -07:00

In the vast expanse of the American highway system, where eighteen-wheelers roar and shuttle buses hum, tragedies can unfold in mere seconds. The collision of metal and asphalt can lead to devastating consequences, altering lives irreversibly. Among these tragedies, the fatal crash on Interstate 64 in December 2022 stands out, not just for its heartbreaking toll but for the shadows it cast on the practices of Triton Logistics, a company whose name became intertwined with the grim incident. Dwayne Sykes, a former driver for Triton Logistics Inc, found himself thrust into an unexpected spotlight following the Interstate 64 crash. Though he had left the company just days before the tragedy, his name emerged in the investigation, linking him to a narrative he vehemently denies. "I cannot sit back any longer knowing what they did," Sykes disclosed in a recent interview. "I can’t sit back any longer because I know what happened." In the early hours of December 16, 2022, a Triton Freightliner collided with a shuttle bus, resulting in the loss of three lives. Daniel Cramer, the truck's actual driver, initially claimed that he had just dropped off his supposed co-driver, Dwayne Sykes. However, Sykes refuted any connection with Cramer, asserting that Triton never employed co-drivers during his tenure. The perplexing question arises: how did Sykes’ name become entangled with the crash if he was no longer with Triton? According to Sykes, his information was stolen, with his electronic logs manipulated to portray him as a co-pilot. "They stole my information because I didn’t give anyone my permission to use my logs," Sykes declared. The revelation doesn't stop there. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report uncovered deeper layers of deception within Triton Logistics. Cramer confessed to investigators that Triton provided him with a cover story to conceal the truth. "I basically repeated what they told me to say," Cramer admitted. "That I had just dropped off my co-driver — which is the same thing that I told that state policeman that night." For Sykes, Cramer's confession resonates deeply. He recalls similar scenarios during his time with Triton, where cover stories were the norm rather than the exception. In the NTSB report, Cramer also divulged Triton's utilization of a data center in Lithuania to manage and manipulate drivers’ electronic logs, allowing them to appear more rested than they actually were. Sykes corroborated this, revealing firsthand experience with manipulated logs. "They would backdate it," Sykes revealed. "They can go into the system and change it." The gravity of these revelations is not lost on Sykes, who has since moved on to a different company. His heart goes out to the families of the victims, and he recognizes the profound impact of Triton's actions. "I’m saddened and I’m devastated," Sykes expressed, emphasizing his sympathy for the victims' families. Sykes’ courage in coming forward sheds light on the darker corners of the trucking industry, where safety can be compromised for profit. His story serves as a reminder of the importance of accountability and transparency within the transportation sector. As investigations continue and legal proceedings unfold, one thing remains certain: Dwayne Sykes' unwavering resolve to unveil the truth has become a beacon of hope for those seeking justice in the wake of tragedy.
Learn more: Inside the Dark World of Trucking Manipulation: Triton Logistics Inc

Web of Deception: Truth On Gulf Brokers Limited Trading

techslo — Sat, 23 Mar 2024 02:31:46 -07:00

In the world of finance, where opportunities to grow wealth abound, there also lurks the dark underbelly of scams and fraudulent schemes. Among the most insidious are the high-yield investment programs (HYIPs) that promise riches but deliver only ruin. Gulf Brokers Limited stands out as a prime example of such deceit, orchestrating a web of deception that spans continents and leaves devastation in its wake. The meticulous of Gulf Brokers Limited's operations required exhaustive investigative efforts. Through the sifting of hundreds of documents and interviews with confidential informants, a clearer picture emerged of a network of organized criminals perpetrating trading scams across multiple countries since 2018. Their actions have not only wiped out millions of dollars from the market every month but have also left thousands of lives shattered in their wake. One of the most alarming aspects of Gulf Brokers' activities is the lack of accountability facilitated by regulatory loopholes and the absence of extradition treaties in many jurisdictions. This sense of impunity has emboldened the perpetrators to perpetrate increasingly grotesque crimes, leaving victims with little to no recourse for justice. At the heart of Gulf Brokers' operations is a deliberate targeting of investors in regions like India, South-East Asia, and Africa. Operating as a limited liability company registered in Seychelles, Gulf Brokers exploits offshore jurisdictions to shield itself from regulatory oversight and accountability. This lack of regulation means that investors' funds are not protected or insured by any government entity, exposing them to significant risk. Despite its unregistered status in many countries, Gulf Brokers presents itself as a legitimate entity through its website, gulfbrokers.com. However, a closer examination reveals glaring inconsistencies and warning signs. While claiming regulation by the Financial Services Authority of Seychelles, the reality falls far short of reputable regulatory standards. The minimal startup capital required and absence of robust investor protection mechanisms paint a grim picture for unsuspecting investors. Further analysis of Gulf Brokers' website exposes their aggressive marketing tactics, targeting clients in Europe and the USA through social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Behind the glossy facade lie call centers in South India, where associates facilitate the scam through persuasive tactics and false promises. Key associates such as Copreus Pvt Ltd in Sri Lanka and Victoria Partners and ZPH Marketing play integral roles in sustaining Gulf Brokers' fraudulent activities. These entities serve as conduits for funneling funds and perpetuating the deception on a global scale. For traders seeking safety and security in the volatile world of online trading, the cautionary tale of Gulf Brokers serves as a stark reminder of the importance of due diligence. While the promise of high returns may be enticing, it is essential to prioritize the safety of investments by choosing reputable brokers regulated by esteemed authorities like the FCA in the UK or CySec in Cyprus. These regulatory bodies not only enforce stringent rules to protect investors but also provide avenues for recourse in the event of fraud or bankruptcy. With segregated accounts and compensation mechanisms in place, investors can trade with confidence, knowing that their funds are safeguarded against unscrupulous actors. In the ongoing battle against financial fraud, shedding light on the operations of entities like Gulf Brokers is crucial. By exposing their tactics and warning potential victims, we can empower investors to make informed decisions and safeguard their financial well-being against exploitation and deception.
Learn more: Web of Deception: Truth On Gulf Brokers Limited Trading

Pacific Tycoon : Investment Scam

techslo — Thu, 11 May 2023 01:09:36 -07:00

Most people who hear about container investments also hear about Pacific Tycoon scam. Due to the numerous scams that exist, Pacific Tycoon is just another container scam to be cautious about. Make sure you do thorough research before investing in any containers. A simplified process has been implemented. You buy containers from underdeveloped countries for less. Then you hire a company such as Pacific Tycoon to lease your containers for their clients. After a 9-10 month gap, the containers arrive in China and are sold at a profit. The company takes a small commission and you receive the rest. When you open the website associated with the company, as in this case, Pacific Tycoon, you will be greeted with a really aesthetically pleasing website. This can easily fool you into believing it is original. The catchy advertisement followed by insane return promises can be misleading in real life. Note that they promise a fixed return of 12% on the amount invested per year. In some cases it might reach 24.13% as it happened last year, according to them. They say that all company containers are fully trackable. Everyone will have full legal rights regarding the containers that they buy. Most of them are independent trackers in various countries which act as recipients of the container owners. The money is actually transferred to the scammer's account in those countries. The majority of the accounts belong to underdeveloped nations that have no association with the company. These companies heavily invest in PR activities where they pay different blog owners to write fake reviews about them. They also write about how Pacific Tycoon helped them get the most favorable investments and other fabricated information. Often, they post fake reviews on forums regarding their company so that they can win over the trust of their customers. However, a deeper investigation will reveal how the company has scammed thousands of people and how many there who have lost all their lifetime savings on it. Hence, as a precautionary measure, it is often stated that if you want to invest in containers and other stuff, it is recommended that you should do thorough research about all such stuff before you decide to invest in containers. In simple words, stay away from container investments as much as you can.
Learn more: Pacific Tycoon : Investment Scam

Gian Paolo Aliatis : Defrauded many tenants

techslo — Sat, 01 Apr 2023 01:14:38 -07:00

Gian Paolo Aliatis is a self-made entrepreneur and the founder and CEO of multiple companies, based both in the UK and abroad. His companies specialise in buyouts, venture capital, turnarounds, and real estate investments, with a focus on co-living and prop-tech. Gian Paolo Aliatis of BRKV London knew from a young age that he didn’t want to settle for working for someone else and that he needed to have his own business and make his own way. The key to success, he knew, was audacity. He left his country with strong self-belief and a desire to be successful in business, whilst simultaneously enjoying the best life has to offer. The director of a lettings agency that tried to pass itself off as a membership club to dodge the law while leaving tenants in the lurch has been hit with a bill of more than £40,000 in the first prosecution of its kind in the UK. Gian Paulo Aliatis, the director of Lifestyle Club Ltd in Islington, London, pleaded guilty to three charges on July 30 after Islington Council’s Trading Standards investigated his firm’s bogus claim that it was a members’ club and therefore not subject to the legal regulations for letting agents. He was sentenced after pleading guilty to three counts of engaging in an unfair commercial practice between October 1, 2017 and April 30, 2018, contrary to Regulations 8 and 15 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. Snaresbrook Crown Court heard that the company, trading as Lifestyle Club from premises in White Lion Street, Islington, advertised on SpareRoom.co.uk, marketing itself as a membership club. Aliatis – whose name appears 15 different times on Companies House, a UK register of companies – claims he no longer lets any flatshares, according to an email sent to VICE World News. Despite denying he’s currently involved with Simple Properties or any other rent-to-rent companies, both Gonzalez and Leger's stories of exploitation link back to Aliatis and bear a remarkable resemblance to the schemes run by Simple Properties and the Lifestyle Club Ltd. Instead of charging tenants a deposit, which is refundable and by law has to be paid into a tenancy deposit protection scheme, Aliatis admitted his firm demanded a non-refundable “joining fee”. Lifestyle Club also admitted pressuring customers into signing a “membership agreement” without giving them time to read and understand the document, and denying potential tenants the chance to view a property in person before agreeing to live there. IN OTHER SCAM: The Lifestyle Club Ltd., owned by an individual named Gian Paolo Aliatis Mejia, took a £200 “joining fee” which was non-refundable, rather than a deposit, which legally is refundable and should be protected by a deposit protection scheme. Tenants – called members, much like Gonzalez and Leger were – were also asked to pay a monthly “membership fee” rather than rent. Aliatis was fined for unfair commercial practice after pleading guilty on three charges. After the case closed, Simple Properties Management (which lists a Miguel Cabeo Cespedes as its director) took over properties previously run by The Lifestyle Club Ltd. Although the companies changed, the claimant in the original case says in court documents that she continued to visit the same office and work with the same staff, confirmed by correspondence at the time. A court judgment against Simple Properties Management shows that the claimant, originally in a Lifestyle Club Ltd. agreement, faced an illegal eviction once the property was taken over by Simple Properties Management, including having the locks changed on the property while she was out and having her personal property removed. Eventually, Simple Properties were made to pay damages of £56,675.91 in a civil case plus legal fees. The lawyer representing the client told VICE World News the fine was never paid as the company eventually dissolved. Aliatis denies any similarity between the two companies. “We have never shared offices with any company operating within the same industry. From 2018, we sold parts of our property portfolio to various companies, one of them being Simple Properties." Figures named in court cases against Simple Properties, like Cespedes, are hard to track down. They often do not appear in court as they do not attempt to defend their case (in some cases because they’re facing other charges at the time, as was the case with Cespedes) and leave very little information online. Aliatis, the mastermind behind the original Airbnb-like scheme, however, is far from hidden. The “entrepreneur” – who runs a blog with the slogan EVERYTHING YOU WANT IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF FEAR on its landing page – declined numerous requests to speak by phone. Over email, he said that in his opinion, “shared accommodation in London is one of the answers to the London housing needs”, but due to complex “regulation” and “the demonisation of Landlords by councils and media” there are simply too few to solve the housing crisis (in the UK, the private rented sector has the worst affordability and conditions despite being extremely prolific).
Learn more: Gian Paolo Aliatis : Defrauded many tenants

Bravia Capital Founder Bharat Bhise Under Scrutiny

techslo — Tue, 14 Mar 2023 03:21:40 -07:00

It is never easy to write about individuals who have been involved in shady business practices, particularly when they have been found guilty of producing false documents, lying under oath, and defrauding the court. However, it is important to shed light on such individuals and their actions to ensure that justice is served, and others are not harmed in the future. In this case, we are discussing an individual who has been involved in multiple lawsuits and legal battles due to his involvement in shady business practices with a Chinese company. This individual, who we will refer to as Mr. Bharat Sharatchandra Bhise of Bravia Capital, has been accused of numerous illegal activities, including fraud, deception, and the production of false documents. A donation of shares valued at approximately $18 billion to a New York City-based foundation is raising questions about a conglomerate that is the largest Chinese investor in the United States, the New York Times reports. The downfall of HNA started when Geo Wengui, a fugitive Chinese billionaire, alleged that officials in the CCP and their relatives were undisclosed shareholders in HNA. Hainan-based HNA Group announced earlier this week that businessman Guan Jun transferred his more than 29 percent stake in HNA to the Hainan Cihang Charity Foundation, the company's charitable arm in the U.S. According to HNA, 52 percent of the company is owned by Cihang foundations, including a 22.8 percent stake held by a sister charity in China. However, HNA chief executive Adam Tan told the Financial Times that Guan and another shareholder, Bharat Bhise aka Bharat Sharatchandra Bhise, who had transferred much of his stake to Guan last year, never actually owned the shares "but had just held the stake for us," despite Bhise and Guan — about whom little is known — being listed as the owners in the company's regulatory filings. Also, he alleged that HNA had allowed Chinese government officials and their relatives to use the company’s aircrafts for ‘purely personal reasons’. This prompted many people and authorities to question the ownership structure of HNA. Moreover, it made many people realize how suspicious the entire structure was. The “Indian dealmaker” started attracting a lot of attention when he transferred all of his 30% stake in the company to an unknown person named “Guan Jun”. According to media reports, Guan had ties to one of China’s most influential government officials. Guan had purchased Bharat’s stake from him in 2017. The China Human Rights Accountability Center called for investigation into this deal and shared several important details. When asked how the deal took place, neither Bharat nor HNA disclosed any information. Both of them refrained from sharing any information regarding the transfer of the conglomerate’s ownership. However, the pressure kept increasing and HNA had to release an open letter themselves. In their letter, they didn’t mention Guan. Instead, they claimed that Bharat’s stakes in the company had gone to a US-based charity. Later, Bharat said that the senior management of the company is Buddhist and wants all the shares to go to charity at some point. Bharat Bhise never explained how the ownership of his shares which were worth in billions went to the donor Guan Jun. Guan’s registered address is of a simple apartment where reports found a trash-laden building. Similarly, Guan Jun’s business address was the address of a street-side spa in a residential neighborhood. Certainly, the details were false and both Bharat and HNA were hiding something. Both Bharat and Guan’s shares were deemed shady and suspicious by international media. HNA claimed that Guan didn’t work for the company but media reports say that he served as co-chairman in a P2P lending platform of HNA. Due to such dubious ownership, Bank of AMerica decided not to do any business dealings with HNA. However, after receiving all of these allegations, nothing came out of it. Bharat Bhise roamed scot-free and has since moved onto other ventures. As the chairman of Bravia Capital, Bharat had co-invested with HNA in many of its overseas investments. These included Africa World Airlines, MyCargo Airlines and SeaCo, a marine container firm.
Learn more: Bravia Capital Founder Bharat Bhise Under Scrutiny

SEC Files Fraud Charges Against Safeguard Metal LLC

techslo — Wed, 01 Mar 2023 03:54:53 -08:00

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against Safeguard Metals LLC, and its owner, Jeffrey Santulan, for engaging in a multi-million dollar fraudulent scheme involving hundreds of investors who were at or near retirement age. According to the SEC's complaint, from December 2017 through at least July 2021, Safeguard and Santulan acted as investment advisers and persuaded investors to sell their existing securities, transfer the proceeds into self-directed Individual Retirement Accounts, and invest the proceeds into gold and silver coins by making false and misleading statements about the safety and liquidity of the investors' securities investments, Safeguard's business, and its compensation. As alleged, Safeguard Metal fraudulently marketed itself as a full-service investment firm with offices in London, New York City, and Beverly Hills that employed prominent individuals in the securities industry and had $11 billion in assets under management. In reality, Santulan allegedly operated the company from a small leased space in a Woodland Hills, Calif. office building using sales agents. The complaint further alleges that Safeguard's sales agents used prepared scripts, some written by Santulan, that were filled with false and misleading statements about how the market was going to crash and how their retirement accounts would be frozen under a new 'unpublicized' law. Safeguard and Santulan also allegedly misled investors about Safeguard's commissions and markups on the coins, charging average markups of approximately 64% on its sales of silver coins, instead of the 4% to 33% markups that they disclosed to investors. According to the complaint, Safeguard obtained approximately $67 million from the sale of coins to more than 450 mostly elderly, retail investors, and kept approximately $25.5 million in mark ups. The SEC's complaint, which was filed in federal district court in the Central District of California, charges Safeguard and Santulan with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and also charges Santulan with aiding and abetting Safeguard's violations and as a control person within the meaning of Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains, plus prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. The SEC's investigation was conducted by Jedediah B. Forkner and Jean M. Javorski of the SEC's Chicago Regional Office, and was supervised by Anne C. McKinley. The litigation will be led by Jonathan S. Polish. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and state regulators that are members of the North American Securities Administrators Association. Jeffrey Santulan launched new firm under Alliance Shield LLC name to scam the innocent. Changing name won't change scammer charactre and nature to defraud.
Learn more: SEC Files Fraud Charges Against Safeguard Metal LLC

RA Solar Technologie Investment GmbH: Public Warning

techslo — Sat, 18 Jun 2022 01:15:01 -07:00

Public Warning by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority that RA Solar Technologie Investment GmbH is suspected of “conducting unauthorised activities in the financial market”. Editor’s Note: Research by OffshoreAlert in the Swiss Commercial Registry showed that the sole “partner and manager” of Technische Isolierung Schweiz GmbH is Tamás Hodel, while resigned representatives include Yücel Yüce. On its website at rainvestmentgmbh.com, it is stated that: “RA Solar Technologie Investment GmbH offers Fresh Cut Cash Backed (BG) Bank Guarantee and (SBLC) Standby Letter of Credit issued with HSBC Bank plc.” Avoiding fraud brokers like RA Solar Technologie Investment GmbH and reading RA Solar Technologie Investment GmbH is most important because even if you trade with the best trading strategies and knowledge, you can suddenly lose all your earnings with a fraud broker. Unfortunately, if you were scammed by RA Solar Technologie Investment GmbH scam broker and don’t know your options to recover funds, FraudBrokers Team can definitely help you. While there are plenty of legitimate brokers out there whom traders can trust, there are many other brokers who are considered to be fraud brokers due to several valid reasons. These brokers like RA Solar Technologie Investment GmbH have to be avoided in order to keep your trading funds safe. These scam brokers have shown behaviors of a scam like warnings from well known regulating authorities, copying other legitimate brokers’ sites, non-regulation, illegitimate bonuses and withdrawals conditions, etc.
Learn more: RA Solar Technologie Investment GmbH: Public Warning